There is also the shroud of turin, which verifies Jesus in a new way than other evidences.
QuoteDoes consciousness depend on flesh and blood?
The answer is almost certainly no, according to Eric Schwitzgebel, a distinguished professor of philosophy at the University of California, Riverside.
In a new working paper, Schwitzgebel and Jeremy Pober, a former UCR graduate student who is now a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Lisbon, assert that consciousness is likely possible in life forms made of much different stuff. Think of the five-limbed alien with a rock-like exterior in the recent blockbuster movie "Project Hail Mary."
Schwitzgebel and Pober do not attempt to define consciousness. Instead, they proceed from the premise that it's a real and recognizable phenomenon, and pose a narrower question: Must it be tied to the biology found on Earth?
The paper comes at a time when the prospect of conscious artificial intelligence looms large, fueling utopian dreams and dystopian nightmares. The authors, who touch just briefly on the matter, do not take a firm position either way — and, in fact, diverge in their views. But the arguments they advance leave open the possibility that AI could be conscious, though perhaps not in its current form.
At the heart of the paper's argument is the philosophical notion of "substrate flexibility." As the authors explain it, a "target property," such as being a cup, is substrate flexible if it can be achieved with different kinds of materials. A cup is substrate flexible; it can be made with glass, plastic, or many other substances. Similarly, a book can be printed on paper or stored electronically, and a records can be encoded on vinyl or on compact discs.
Consciousness, Schwitzgebel and Pober argue, is also substrate flexible.
"The universe may contain minds stranger than we can imagine," Schwitzgebel said.
The observable part of the universe contains about 1 trillion galaxies. Planets are common, and the great majority have environments quite different than Earth's, astronomers believe.
For the purposes of their argument, Schwitzgebel and Pober estimate that at least 1,000 behaviorally sophisticated, extraterrestrial civilizations have existed at some point in the cosmos. It's a conservative estimate, they say, noting that "one recent survey found median scientific estimates over one civilization per galaxy at some point in that galaxy's lifetime."
[. . .]
The authors' key argument turns on the Copernican tradition in astronomy. The Renaissance polymath Nicolaus Copernicus and his heirs made a humbling series of discoveries: Earth is not the center of the solar system, the solar system is not the center of the galaxy, and the Milky Way is not the center of the universe. In other words, humanity occupies a less exceptional position in the cosmos than once imagined.
Schwitzgebel and Pober extend this lesson to consciousness: To wit, it probably isn't special.
Assuming there are many behaviorally sophisticated species in the universe with different biological structures, the authors argue that it would amount to a form of "terrocentrism"— unjustified treatment of Earth life as uniquely privileged — to believe consciousness belongs only to organisms like us. The authors coin a phrase, "the Copernican principle of consciousness," to describe this idea.
They don't claim, however, that every advanced life form must be conscious. Rather, they argue that if consciousness exists among behaviorally sophisticated beings, it would be strange to think that only organisms sharing our biochemical architecture could possess it.
[Continues . . .]
QuoteAbstract:
We present a novel argument for the substrate flexibility of consciousness – that is, for the idea that conscious experiences can arise in a variety of different types of physical media, not just in biological animals as they currently exist on Earth.
Some recent critiques of standard arguments for the substrate flexibility of consciousness (e.g., Cao 2022; Block 2025; Seth forthcoming) have emphasized that humanlike consciousness might require our specific biological substrate. However, such critiques are too narrowly focused to address the issue of consciousness in entities whose experience may be very different from ours, for example alien life forms or future AI systems designed along unfamiliar lines.
Given that it's likely that functionally complex, behaviorally sophisticated entities have arisen or will arise many times in the observable universe, in diverse substrates, we argue that it would be a violation of a principle of Copernican mediocrity to hold that among these diverse entities, only we, or only we and a small proportion of others who share our substrate, are conscious.
QuoteThey were pillars of their church, congregants in a little-known denomination that sets itself apart from the world and teaches that even the most unconscionable acts can be wiped away — not just forgiven, but forgotten and never spoken of again.
Quote from: billy rubin on June 18, 2026, 12:52:33 AMwell i dunno shit about imgbb, but that is an exceptional image.
....

