There is also the shroud of turin, which verifies Jesus in a new way than other evidences.
QuoteThere's no denying that something massive lurks at the heart of the Milky Way galaxy, but a new study asks whether a supermassive black hole is the only possible explanation.
All measurements taken of the galactic center to date are consistent with a highly dense object around 4 million times as massive as the Sun. According to the new paper, though, if you squint just a little, all that evidence can also apply to a giant, compact blob of fermionic dark matter, without an event horizon.
We currently don't have the observational precision to tell the difference between these two models. However, a dark matter composition of the galactic nucleus would give astronomers a new tool for interpreting the dark matter structure of the entire galaxy.
"We are not just replacing the black hole with a dark object; we are proposing that the supermassive central object and the galaxy's dark matter halo are two manifestations of the same, continuous substance," explains astrophysicist Carlos Argüelles of the Institute of Astrophysics La Plata in Argentina.
[Continues . . .]
QuoteAbstract:
Surrounding Sgr A*, a cluster of young and massive stars coexist with a population of dust-enshrouded objects, whose astrometric data can be used to scrutinize the nature of Sgr A*. An alternative to the black hole (BH) scenario has been recently proposed in terms of a supermassive compact object composed of self-gravitating fermionic dark matter (DM). Such horizon-less configurations can reproduce the relativistic effects measured for S2 orbit, while being part of a single continuous configuration whose extended halo reproduces the latest GAIA-DR3 rotation curve.
In this work, we statistically compare different fermionic DM configurations aimed to fit the astrometric data of S2, and five G-sources, and compare with the BH potential when appropriate. We sample the parameter spaces via Markov Chain Monte Carlo statistics and perform a quantitative comparison estimating Bayes factors for models that share the same likelihood function.
We extend previous results of the S2 and G2 orbital fits for 56 keV fermions (low core-compactness) and show the results for 300 keV fermions (high core-compactness). For the selected S2 data set, the former model is slightly favoured over the latter. However, more precise S2 data sets, as obtained by the GRAVITY instrument, remain to be analysed in light of the fermionic models.
For the G-objects, no conclusive preference emerges between models. For all stellar objects tested, the BH and fermionic models predict orbital parameters that differ by less than 1 per cent. More accurate data, particularly from stars closer to Sgr A*, is necessary to statistically distinguish between the models considered.
Quote from: Anne D. on February 07, 2026, 09:09:31 AMSuch a beautiful, brave soul. It's not just like anyone said it would be. It's decidedly awful.
Quote from: Icarus on February 03, 2026, 11:57:13 PMI respectfully disagree Rec. We need not be diplomatic nor bother with polite deception. I believe that the multi millions of angry demonstrators are not much interested in being polite or diplomatic, not now. We have damned well had very close to all that we can peacefully tolerate.
We have given up on the hope that space aliens will kidnap the mentally and morally disabled Trump.