News:

If you have any trouble logging in, please contact admins via email. tankathaf *at* gmail.com or
recusantathaf *at* gmail.com

Main Menu

Norway tries to reclaim explorer Amundsen's ship Maud

Started by Tank, March 19, 2012, 08:40:51 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Tank

Norway tries to reclaim explorer Amundsen's ship Maud

QuoteA hearing on Thursday will decide the fate of a ship once captained by Roald Amundsen, the Norwegian explorer first to reach the south pole.

The Maud is partially sunk in Cambridge Bay in Nunavut, northern Canada.

A permit to return the ship to Norway was denied in December and Canadian officials have argued the ship is crucial to the nation's heritage.

Campaigner Jan Wanggaard is spearheading a project to overturn the decision.

Called Maud Returns Home, the project would see the wreck towed back to Norway to become a museum near Oslo...

This seem a little churlish on the part of the Canadian authorities. If they valued the ship it should be in a museum already.
If religions were TV channels atheism is turning the TV off.
"Religion is a culture of faith; science is a culture of doubt." ― Richard P. Feynman
'It is said that your life flashes before your eyes just before you die. That is true, it's called Life.' - Terry Pratchett
Remember, your inability to grasp science is not a valid argument against it.

Guardian85

As a norwegian it should not be surprising on which side of this I am coming down.
There is a legal claim on the wreck as it was bought and paid for (1$) by norwegians.
And anyway, Amundsen is one of Norways biggest heroes. It is only right that such an important piece of our history be returned.


"If scientist means 'not the dumbest motherfucker in the room,' I guess I'm a scientist, then."
-Unknown Smartass-

DeterminedJuliet

Canada is pretty sensitive about it's sovereignty in the Arctic these days. I suspect that might have something to do with it.
I agree though, the ship should be returned.
"We've thought of life by analogy with a journey, with pilgrimage which had a serious purpose at the end, and the THING was to get to that end; success, or whatever it is, or maybe heaven after you're dead. But, we missed the point the whole way along; It was a musical thing and you were supposed to sing, or dance, while the music was being played.

Recusant

Okay, "the Cambridge area's first radio station" is all very well, but given the location of the vessel, I have a feeling not many people visit the site.  ::) In fact, I would be surprised if more than a small handful of people (outside of local residents) have made a conscious effort to see it in all the years since it sank in 1930. I think it would get more appreciation in Norway's hands. On the other hand, it seems that the Canadian government is listening to local folks who want to keep the wreck where it is.
"Religion is fundamentally opposed to everything I hold in veneration — courage, clear thinking, honesty, fairness, and above all, love of the truth."
— H. L. Mencken


DeterminedJuliet

Whoever would like to keep it should really remove it out of the ocean or there won't be much left to fight over soon. It reminds me of wreck on the west coast of Newfoundland called the "Ethie". It ran aground in 1919, and you can see it from the shore, but there's not much left of it now.



The arctic/atlantic ocean isn't exactly kind to man-made relics.
"We've thought of life by analogy with a journey, with pilgrimage which had a serious purpose at the end, and the THING was to get to that end; success, or whatever it is, or maybe heaven after you're dead. But, we missed the point the whole way along; It was a musical thing and you were supposed to sing, or dance, while the music was being played.