When one conveys certain things, particularly of such gravity, should one not then appropriately cite sources, authorities...
Quote from: Dark Lightning on May 09, 2024, 06:44:06 PM^OK. I go to an antique truck forum and we have to tell the dirty jokes to each other via PM.
Quote from: Tank on May 09, 2024, 02:01:49 PMCan anybody confirm that this is a partridge please? It is the first time I have seen one .
Quote from: Tank on May 09, 2024, 09:25:17 AMInteresting.
Quote from: Dark Lightning on March 27, 2024, 11:42:57 PMPretty much the only sites I've seen that require hosting sites for images are atheist in outlook. I wonder why that is?
Quote from: Tank on May 08, 2024, 07:34:11 AMQuote from: Recusant on May 08, 2024, 03:49:41 AMI don't think the "knitting tool" hypothesis is conclusive. Some of those dodecahedrons are only about 4 centimeters tall (1.5 inches). Seems unlikely that they were knitting gloves for infants (or toddlers for that matter). Some of them are made of stone and solid as well--would not work for the purpose. Then there are the smaller versions made of gold that were found in Asia.
Similarly enigmatic ancient objects: the carved stone balls from the British Isles.
Damn! Spoil sport!
Quote from: hermes2015 on May 08, 2024, 04:58:26 AMQuote from: Recusant on May 08, 2024, 03:49:41 AMI don't think the "knitting tool" hypothesis is conclusive. Some of those dodecahedrons are only about 4 centimeters tall (1.5 inches). Seems unlikely that they were knitting gloves for infants (or toddlers for that matter). Some of them are made of stone and solid as well--would not work for the purpose. Then there are the smaller versions made of gold that were found in Asia.
Similarly enigmatic ancient objects: the carved stone balls from the British Isles.
Thanks for the link; those stone balls are wonderful. They are quite inspiring and I shall look at more examples to use as seeds for my concrete spheres.