News:

Nitpicky? Hell yes.

Main Menu

What Will Change Everything?

Started by Miss Anthrope, January 23, 2009, 09:58:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ihateyoumike

Quote from: "Miss Anthrope"...in the sense that when i was little I use to boggle my mind by thinking about the vastness of space.


Don't know what you're talking about here, because I still do.  :lol:

I don't know if I'll ever be able to get my mind completely around that one.
Prayers that need no answer now, cause I'm tired of who I am
You were my greatest mistake, I fell in love with your sin
Your littlest sin.

Miss Anthrope

Quote from: "Ihateyoumike"
Quote from: "Miss Anthrope"...in the sense that when i was little I use to boggle my mind by thinking about the vastness of space.


Don't know what you're talking about here, because I still do.  :lol:
How big is the smallest fish in the pond? You catch one hundred fishes, all
of which are greater than six inches. Does this evidence support the hypothesis
that no fish in the pond is much less than six inches long? Not if your
net can’t catch smaller fish. -Nick Bostrom

karadan

Quote from: "Miss Anthrope"
Quote from: "Ihateyoumike"
Quote from: "Miss Anthrope"...in the sense that when i was little I use to boggle my mind by thinking about the vastness of space.


Don't know what you're talking about here, because I still do.  :lol:

I like to envisage the universe as a Klein Bottle. It makes it far easier on the brain. Otherwise, it is like trying to imagine what it is like to be dead. The brain cannot cope.
QuoteI find it mistifying that in this age of information, some people still deny the scientific history of our existence.

Miss Anthrope

Quote from: "karadan"I like to envisage the universe as a Klein Bottle. It makes it far easier on the brain. Otherwise, it is like trying to imagine what it is like to be dead. The brain cannot cope.

I've thought of it that way before (admittedly not "on my own", I've read things that made that connection). It certainly does help as far as providing a rudimetnary visual, but the Klein bottle concept itself is pretty bizarre. Whenever I start thinking along these lines, I just hit a wall and reality makes about as much sense as religion in some ways. This actually has a lot to do with why I'm on the agnostic end of atheism.
How big is the smallest fish in the pond? You catch one hundred fishes, all
of which are greater than six inches. Does this evidence support the hypothesis
that no fish in the pond is much less than six inches long? Not if your
net can’t catch smaller fish. -Nick Bostrom

karadan

Quote from: "Miss Anthrope"
Quote from: "karadan"I like to envisage the universe as a Klein Bottle. It makes it far easier on the brain. Otherwise, it is like trying to imagine what it is like to be dead. The brain cannot cope.

I've thought of it that way before (admittedly not "on my own", I've read things that made that connection). It certainly does help as far as providing a rudimetnary visual, but the Klein bottle concept itself is pretty bizarre. Whenever I start thinking along these lines, I just hit a wall and reality makes about as much sense as religion in some ways. This actually has a lot to do with why I'm on the agnostic end of atheism.

I guess it just boils down to how it is explained to you. I used to have a hard time understanding the concept of the fourth dimension until i saw this vid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDaKzQNl ... re=related

The way it is explained just seemed to fit with me. I now have a far easier time trying to visualise this concept. I like brain fodder like this.
QuoteI find it mistifying that in this age of information, some people still deny the scientific history of our existence.

Miss Anthrope

Quote from: "karadan"I guess it just boils down to how it is explained to you. I used to have a hard time understanding the concept of the fourth dimension until i saw this vid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDaKzQNl ... re=related

The way it is explained just seemed to fit with me. I now have a far easier time trying to visualise this concept. I like brain fodder like this.

Hey karadan, thanks for the link, it had a few examples that I hadn't seen before. Didn't really help with my overall confusion, though, which I meant in more of "big picture" way. The actual concepts don't boggle my mind (too much), I've seen a lot of material dealing with the dimensions. It's the implications many theories have in terms of our reality that makes me hit walls. For instance, some cosmologists now think that the third dimension is like a holographic image being "projected" from a massive 2d surface (in a sense, the "edge" of the universe) and then there's the recent discovery that photons can communicate at least 100,000 times the speed of light - http://www.physorg.com/news137937526.html

When forced to consider that space & time are even less important than we already know, I start to also wonder if all the scientific knowledge in the world would really help me understand reality in the purest sense of the word. Everything just seems...absurd.
How big is the smallest fish in the pond? You catch one hundred fishes, all
of which are greater than six inches. Does this evidence support the hypothesis
that no fish in the pond is much less than six inches long? Not if your
net can’t catch smaller fish. -Nick Bostrom

karadan

Quote from: "Miss Anthrope"
Quote from: "karadan"I guess it just boils down to how it is explained to you. I used to have a hard time understanding the concept of the fourth dimension until i saw this vid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDaKzQNl ... re=related

The way it is explained just seemed to fit with me. I now have a far easier time trying to visualise this concept. I like brain fodder like this.

Hey karadan, thanks for the link, it had a few examples that I hadn't seen before. Didn't really help with my overall confusion, though, which I meant in more of "big picture" way. The actual concepts don't boggle my mind (too much), I've seen a lot of material dealing with the dimensions. It's the implications many theories have in terms of our reality that makes me hit walls. For instance, some cosmologists now think that the third dimension is like a holographic image being "projected" from a massive 2d surface (in a sense, the "edge" of the universe) and then there's the recent discovery that photons can communicate at least 100,000 times the speed of light - http://www.physorg.com/news137937526.html

When forced to consider that space & time are even less important than we already know, I start to also wonder if all the scientific knowledge in the world would really help me understand reality in the purest sense of the word. Everything just seems...absurd.

Indeed. As you go deeper and deeper into the realms of reality, it no longer 'seems' absurd but actually is absurd hehe. I think the human race will hit a wall fairly soon anyway because i doubt any single human brain will be able to comprehend the stuff they are trying to conceive. We already take many theories for granted - theories which have initially been thought up by people like Hawkins or Higgs but at some point even their intellect won't actually be able to visualise the concepts their mathematics (or metamathematics) creates for them.

Thanks for that link by the way. that is super interesting. :)
QuoteI find it mistifying that in this age of information, some people still deny the scientific history of our existence.

Miss Anthrope

Quote from: "karadan"Indeed. As you go deeper and deeper into the realms of reality, it no longer 'seems' absurd but actually is absurd hehe. .

Good point! I should change my world-view description from "Free-thinker" to "Absurdist" :lol:  Seriously though, I love it. I think it would be boring if we really understood everything, I mean, a good portion of media I enjoy is in the "mystery" category.
How big is the smallest fish in the pond? You catch one hundred fishes, all
of which are greater than six inches. Does this evidence support the hypothesis
that no fish in the pond is much less than six inches long? Not if your
net can’t catch smaller fish. -Nick Bostrom

karadan

Quote from: "Miss Anthrope"
Quote from: "karadan"Indeed. As you go deeper and deeper into the realms of reality, it no longer 'seems' absurd but actually is absurd hehe. .

Good point! I should change my world-view description from "Free-thinker" to "Absurdist" :)
QuoteI find it mistifying that in this age of information, some people still deny the scientific history of our existence.

Miss Anthrope

Quote from: "karadan"I'm rather partial to the multiple consecutive concentric universe theory. It is a load of (ninth dimensional) twaddle, but what a fantastically beautiful load of twaddle it is!

I had to google that, and the first relevant link that popped up was actually a thread of your's on this forum, where I found out it was created by Iain Banks (and company).Based on the name, I actually wouldn't have been surprised if I had found out that it was an actual theory put forth by scientists.

After reading your summary, I'd have to concur, it has a certain elegance to it.
How big is the smallest fish in the pond? You catch one hundred fishes, all
of which are greater than six inches. Does this evidence support the hypothesis
that no fish in the pond is much less than six inches long? Not if your
net can’t catch smaller fish. -Nick Bostrom

karadan

Quote from: "Miss Anthrope"
Quote from: "karadan"I'm rather partial to the multiple consecutive concentric universe theory. It is a load of (ninth dimensional) twaddle, but what a fantastically beautiful load of twaddle it is!

I had to google that, and the first relevant link that popped up was actually a thread of your's on this forum, where I found out it was created by Iain Banks (and company).Based on the name, I actually wouldn't have been surprised if I had found out that it was an actual theory put forth by scientists.

After reading your summary, I'd have to concur, it has a certain elegance to it.

Tee hee. I'm famous!
QuoteI find it mistifying that in this age of information, some people still deny the scientific history of our existence.

4DeepThought2

Robots that can think or computers that can think.
"It may be that our role on this planet is not to worship God, but to create him." - Arthur C. Clarke

Steve Reason

Quote from: "4DeepThought2"Robots that can think or computers that can think.

How do you know we don't already have those??  :upset:

Dick implants that look real.

An effective narcotic painkiller without side effects.  :D
I do not fear death, in view of the fact that I had been dead for billions and billions of years before I was born, and had not suffered the slightest inconvenience from it. ~ Mark Twain

http://rumtickle.blogspot.com/

karadan

I just thought of a new one.

Super-strong materials strong enough to create a viable orbital tether or artificial habitat (ring world) :)

Space would become so much more accessible with an orbital tether.
QuoteI find it mistifying that in this age of information, some people still deny the scientific history of our existence.

Ayreon

I would say, being able to see the things in between.
[size=150]"Man is but a beast, and for that reason, man is more than god."[/size]