News:

Unnecessarily argumentative

Main Menu

Richard Dawkins gets OWNED!

Started by Cortez88, January 06, 2012, 04:05:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Cortez88



;)

McQ

You might try a different intro. Or should I just ban you now?

Link removed.
Elvis didn't do no drugs!
--Penn Jillette

The Magic Pudding

I suspect it has something to do with this -

QuoteThe 13 yr. old brat (who goes by the youtube name as "MisterExpertise") is, you guessed it, using the tired old "15 questions that evolutionists cant answer" trick.

Here is the latest website to scoop up the 15 questions, polish them off, and say "gotcha!" with.
http://creation.com/15-questions


Well, anyways, the boy is being hailed as a mozart type genius by the creatinist crowd. "he's only 13 and he stumped Dawkins?!?" and "This boy is blessed by god with intelligence!" etc.

Nothing canbe further from the truth. The kid has used the "easy cartoon creator", in which all you have to do is paste text online and it spits a pre made cartoon out for you. He didnt even come up with the 15 questions, he merely copied them from somewhere else, and the kid is 13 acting like he has stumped one of the worlds greatest biologists.


..I heard that once during the dark ages that the holy warriors of Christ followed ducks because they thought the ducks were a sign from god....

Asmodean

Are those the links from the OP..?
Quote from: Ecurb Noselrub on July 25, 2013, 08:18:52 PM
In Asmo's grey lump,
wrath and dark clouds gather force.
Luxembourg trembles.

The Magic Pudding

Quote from: Asmodean on January 06, 2012, 05:56:08 AM
Are those the links from the OP..?

No the first link I put in it to another forum where the post I quoted originated, the 2nd one is to creation ministries which I haven't wasted much time on.  I'm only guessing the OP was referring to the 13 year old "genius."

Asmodean

Well, as far as biology is concerned, it would take quite a thirteen year old to take on The Dawkins...  :P
Quote from: Ecurb Noselrub on July 25, 2013, 08:18:52 PM
In Asmo's grey lump,
wrath and dark clouds gather force.
Luxembourg trembles.

Ateo

It's amazing how shamelessly and desperately theist will promote and spread even the smallest perceived victory. When you run into a person who does this, you make an instant judgement call on them, then avoid them in the future.
"Faith is to the human what sand is to the ostrich"

"Humanity's first sin was faith; the first virtue was doubt."

Squid

Looking at those ridiculous "15 Questions for Evolutionists", I'm fairly certain each one of those questions has been addressed, in depth, one way or another here on this very forum....multiple times by multiple members. 

Asmodean

Quote from: Squid on January 06, 2012, 12:50:22 PM
Looking at those ridiculous "15 Questions for Evolutionists", I'm fairly certain each one of those questions has been addressed, in depth, one way or another here on this very forum....multiple times by multiple members. 
It's ok when they ask honestly, looking for answers, but far too many, they just ask those questions, expecting them to be unanswerable and get their panties in a bunch when the questions do indeed get answered.
Quote from: Ecurb Noselrub on July 25, 2013, 08:18:52 PM
In Asmo's grey lump,
wrath and dark clouds gather force.
Luxembourg trembles.

The Magic Pudding

Quote from: Asmodean on January 06, 2012, 01:08:35 PM
It's ok when they ask honestly, looking for answers, but far too many, they just ask those questions, expecting them to be unanswerable and get their panties in a bunch when the questions do indeed get answered.

I don't think honesty troubles their underwear at all,
they just go "you think you're smart, well you're not ner."
We know, you're wrong, ner.
You think you're smart and you're not, ner ner ner ner.

Ali

Have you ever seen the Youtube video of "SunderB00t" (I think I got that right) crowing over his "victory" over The Atheist Experience's Matt Dillahunty?  On one hand, it's infuriating because he soooo did not "win" that debate.  On the other hand, it's so embarrassing that some small part of me actually kind of feels bad for the guy, because it's obvious he totally misunderstood everything Matt was saying, like he has no concept of metaphors whatsoever and now thinks that Matt D believes in unicorns or something.  Mortifyingly stupid.

There is another one where the poster keeps zooming in on Matt D saying "I don't know" to the question "Is there an objective truth?" and just cackling over it.  "He said he doesn't know!  He said he doesn't KNOW!  He is so OWNED!"  Of course, to many theists, it's preferable to pretend that you DO know (because Godsaidso) than to admit that there are things humans don't yet know, or to admit that there are philosophical questions (like "is there an objective truth?") that you are still grappling with. ::)

DeterminedJuliet

Oh, an atheist somewhere, sometime lost a debate?

Hokaies, I give up the athiezm now! thanks for showing me the way!

That was easy.
"We've thought of life by analogy with a journey, with pilgrimage which had a serious purpose at the end, and the THING was to get to that end; success, or whatever it is, or maybe heaven after you're dead. But, we missed the point the whole way along; It was a musical thing and you were supposed to sing, or dance, while the music was being played.

xSilverPhinx

I missed all the fun? :(

What was the question that stumped the Great Dr. Dawkins?
I am what survives if it's slain - Zack Hemsey


The Magic Pudding

Quote from: xSilverPhinx on January 06, 2012, 04:03:55 PM
I missed all the fun? :(

What was the question that stumped the Great Dr. Dawkins?

What is your star sign seemed to stump him.
The interviewer did kind of say I'm just messen with you.

Twentythree

Quote from: McQ on January 06, 2012, 04:22:25 AM
You might try a different intro. Or should I just ban you now?

Link removed.


can you unremove link. I'd like to review it.