News:

Look, I haven't mentioned Zeus, Buddah, or some religion.

Main Menu

My Chat With NephilimFree

Started by tymygy, October 26, 2010, 09:22:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

tymygy

Yesterday I posted a comment on Nephilimfree's page, (He deleted it of course) but I asked him if he could make a video or send me a message refuting the evidence of evolution regarding ERV's. This is what I got.

Yes its long, he talks alot.















This was my FIRST response.










This was his second response.





And this was my final response (so far)


Quote from: "Tank"The Catholic Church jumped on the Big Bang as if it were a choir boy! .

DropLogic

I dunno why you bother at all.  You're not going to change his mind, and he lives in an alternate dimension to top it off.

KDbeads

So I take it this guy hasn't seen the research done on sheep where if you take the virus out of the womb conception can't happen?
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. - Douglas Adams

tymygy

Quote from: "Tank"The Catholic Church jumped on the Big Bang as if it were a choir boy! .

DropLogic

Being provided with nothing is impossible.  :yay:

tymygy

Quote from: "DropLogic"Being provided with nothing is impossible.  :yay:

Nothing new?
Quote from: "Tank"The Catholic Church jumped on the Big Bang as if it were a choir boy! .

The Magic Pudding

QuoteLike all evolutionists, he's still promoting antiquated assumptions as if they were science.

 :)  :D

Explorer

Funny isn't it, how a 50 year-old scientific discipline can be antiquated before the ink dries on a single counter-paradigmatic claim, whereas scrolls written thousands of years ago are still relevant today, despite a complete lack of corroborating evidence.

DropLogic

Quote from: "Explorer"Funny isn't it, how a 50 year-old scientific discipline can be antiquated before the ink dries on a single counter-paradigmatic claim, whereas scrolls written thousands of years ago are still relevant today, despite a complete lack of corroborating evidence.
Plus the ridiculous assertion that faith requires no evidence, while lack of faith seems to require loads.