Laminin is Proof of Jesus?

[PipeBox]

BLASPHEMY!

I agree.

But it sounds like you waste your time with things that are more noble...I wish I was the same.

The nobility of knowledge and its acquirement, I would argue, centers largely on its use.  I haven't written any papers or developed any new technologies, but I will try to explain various things to anyone standing too close to me in a room for too great a duration, provided I don't think they'll hit me.  

But hey, if you want be more like me, awesome.  

[Kyuuketsuki]

No it doesn't ... it doesn't deal in the slightest with why your supposedly all-knowing, all-powerful, perfect God can't create something even a simple human engineer can't improve on.

You mean to say that there is no way for God to be real if He creates things that people can understand? You are also still claiming that those things were flawed prior to the fall. A claim Christians reject.

If you're taking the theistic evolution perspective then I won;t argue though its not a view I support but if you're suggesting that your God had a direct hand in designing some aspects of nature such as the obviously flawed "design" of the excretory/reproductive system in humans then my point stands. It really depends on where you stand (more what perspective you're coming from) on this.

Kyu

[Titan]

No it doesn't ... it doesn't deal in the slightest with why your supposedly all-knowing, all-powerful, perfect God can't create something even a simple human engineer can't improve on.

You mean to say that there is no way for God to be real if He creates things that people can understand? You are also still claiming that those things were flawed prior to the fall. A claim Christians reject.

If you're taking the theistic evolution perspective then I won;t argue though its not a view I support but if you're suggesting that your God had a direct hand in designing some aspects of nature such as the obviously flawed "design" of the excretory/reproductive system in humans then my point stands. It really depends on where you stand (more what perspective you're coming from) on this.

Kyu

What is inherently wrong with the excretory system being unified with the reproductive system? You aren't using both all the time and I don't think you are upset that you can't do both simultaneously...sounds like a pretty efficient use of space to me.

[Kyuuketsuki]

What is inherently wrong with the excretory system being unified with the reproductive system? You aren't using both all the time and I don't think you are upset that you can't do both simultaneously...sounds like a pretty efficient use of space to me.

From a jury-rigged design perspective (naturalistic) yes indeed it is very "clever" (and I include in that the theistic evolution perspective) but it you're talking intelligent design then no it makes no sense at all quite simply from the perspective that a human engineer can envisage better.

Kyu

[Titan]

What is inherently wrong with the excretory system being unified with the reproductive system? You aren't using both all the time and I don't think you are upset that you can't do both simultaneously...sounds like a pretty efficient use of space to me.

From a jury-rigged design perspective (naturalistic) yes indeed it is very "clever" (and I include in that the theistic evolution perspective) but it you're talking intelligent design then no it makes no sense at all quite simply from the perspective that a human engineer can envisage better.

You didn't answer why it was not a great use of space and why it was bad?