Happy Atheist Forum

Getting To Know You => Laid Back Lounge => Topic started by: Firebird on April 30, 2016, 05:45:52 AM

Title: Smoke 'em if you got' em
Post by: Firebird on April 30, 2016, 05:45:52 AM
Because Recusant just reached 4000 posts!

Well done!
Title: Re: Smoke 'em if you got' em
Post by: Magdalena on April 30, 2016, 06:20:28 AM
(https://www.happyatheistforum.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m9w56aGWCd1ql5an1o1_500.gif&hash=fa62a852a2c466504aa6a449faf999464ec1ded2)
Your contributions to HAF help make it the place it is, Recusant; thank you so much for sticking around. Here's to the next thousand! 
;)

Congratulations, Recusant!
Wow! We both have 4,000 posts!
Except your posts are smarter than mine.  :shifty:
Title: Re: Smoke 'em if you got' em
Post by: Tank on April 30, 2016, 06:47:07 AM
Thank you for all the work and effort you have put in over the years in the form of posts, behind the scenes work and advice. This place wouldn't be the same without you. In fact it could well not be here at all.

(https://www.happyatheistforum.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.space.rakuten.co.jp%2Fd%2Fstrg%2Fctrl%2F9%2F8807d06eb271caa922eecfa8843d5f2ee221d459.11.2.9.2.jpeg&hash=2458ce62c9b22bcbe2b2f26d4ef32ba56d865f45)
Title: Re: Smoke 'em if you got' em
Post by: Siz on April 30, 2016, 07:26:38 AM
Chapeau to Rec. Cheers! He's one person, of whom above all others I find myself in any given situation asking "what would Recusant say?" because he always hits the nub of the nail cleanly into touch (where no single metaphore quite does his contributions justice).

And another thing, how many of us pronounce 'Recusant' wrong in our heads? The correct pronunciation is 'rec-yooz-unt', not 'rec-uss-unt'. Even though I know that, he'll always be 'rec-uss-unt' to me because I failed to do the correct research at the outset. And there's another compliment in there somewhere if you squint a bit.
Title: Re: Smoke 'em if you got' em
Post by: Sandra Craft on April 30, 2016, 09:44:07 AM
I ditto everyone else.  Fantastic posts and congratulations!   :daisies:
Title: Re: Smoke 'em if you got' em
Post by: xSilverPhinx on April 30, 2016, 12:21:56 PM
4000 well thought out and especially insightful posts, it seems like not one of them wasted. Congrats, Recusant! :grin:


(https://www.happyatheistforum.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.funusualsuspects.com%2Fuploads%2F7%2F4%2F5%2F2%2F7452560%2Fs538191119328260152_p10_i1_w1500.jpeg&hash=beccb2f347ff2aa1fba67850c511bedcc9b5621f)
Title: Re: Smoke 'em if you got' em
Post by: xSilverPhinx on April 30, 2016, 12:26:18 PM
Quote from: Siz on April 30, 2016, 07:26:38 AM
And another thing, how many of us pronounce 'Recusant' wrong in our heads? The correct pronunciation is 'rec-yooz-unt', not 'rec-uss-unt'.

I got it right. :grin: In portuguese (the way most Brazilians pronounce it - recusante) would be hec-ooz- unch so that probably was a positive influence. It's a nice word, I like it. Well chosen.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Smoke 'em if you got' em
Post by: Ecurb Noselrub on April 30, 2016, 12:38:24 PM
Rec is the most erudite poster here - a real asset.
Title: Re: Smoke 'em if you got' em
Post by: Recusant on April 30, 2016, 03:33:10 PM
 :blush: Thank you folks, for your kind words. Of the many places I visit in the electronic world, I think this is the one that comes closest to a home.  :love:
Title: Re: Smoke 'em if you got' em
Post by: Bad Penny II on April 30, 2016, 03:56:15 PM
You're OK on balance I suppose, your insensitivity to modern Neanderthals notwithstanding.   
Title: Re: Smoke 'em if you got' em
Post by: Guardian85 on April 30, 2016, 04:54:13 PM
Not bad, rec.

Not bad at all...
Title: Re: Smoke 'em if you got' em
Post by: Biggus Dickus on May 01, 2016, 04:12:12 PM
Well done sir, well done.

If I may I would like to extend not only my congratulations to you for the milestone achieved, but also my gratitude for the always interesting and informative threads and comments you post here at HAF.
Please note that I always read your threads with much interest, even if I don't actually comment.

I haven't smoked cigars in years, as I gave the habit up some time ago, but if we were to meet I think I would certainly be up to lighting up a nice double corona with you.

Thanks for all you do here.
Title: Re: Smoke 'em if you got' em
Post by: Tom62 on May 01, 2016, 05:25:21 PM
^Hear, Hear!
Title: Re: Smoke 'em if you got' em
Post by: joeactor on May 02, 2016, 02:23:15 PM
Quote from: Firebird on April 30, 2016, 05:45:52 AM
Because Recusant just reached 4000 posts!

Well done!

Yay!
Title: Re: Smoke 'em if you got' em
Post by: Davin on May 02, 2016, 03:14:11 PM
Congratulations, Recusant!

(https://www.happyatheistforum.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.makeagif.com%2Fmedia%2F3-11-2015%2FylVrPY.gif&hash=5d4a1f46bd76abce724a3f0e9e0efcca741f4f83)
Title: Re: Smoke 'em if you got' em
Post by: Recusant on May 04, 2016, 05:02:33 PM
Quote from: Bruno de la Pole on May 01, 2016, 04:12:12 PM
Well done sir, well done.

If I may I would like to extend not only my congratulations to you for the milestone achieved, but also my gratitude for the always interesting and informative threads and comments you post here at HAF.
Please note that I always read your threads with much interest, even if I don't actually comment.

I haven't smoked cigars in years, as I gave the habit up some time ago, but if we were to meet I think I would certainly be up to lighting up a nice double corona with you.

Thanks for all you do here.

Thank you for that post, Bruno de la Pole. It's been a while since I've smoked a cigar, too, though I did enjoy them in the past. If I'm ever in your part of the world, we can both get light-headed and mildly queasy re-introducing ourselves to the sot-weed (http://www.fromoldbooks.org/Grose-VulgarTongue/s/sot-weed.html).  :smokin cool:
Title: Re: Smoke 'em if you got' em
Post by: Recusant on May 04, 2016, 05:04:14 PM
Quote from: Davin on May 02, 2016, 03:14:11 PM
Congratulations, Recusant!

(https://www.happyatheistforum.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.makeagif.com%2Fmedia%2F3-11-2015%2FylVrPY.gif&hash=5d4a1f46bd76abce724a3f0e9e0efcca741f4f83)

Thanks. Damn, I've never seen that image of Hitchens before; he's just a youngster!