Refuting Theistic Arguments

[Magdalena]

Do you like my giphys Tank? Getting better eh? 

I would ask the Queen of GIFs, Mags, I am merely a bystander of such things.

[Red_Cloud]

Oh! Mags. . . .

[Magdalena]

Oh! Mags. . . .

Dios mio.

[Ricardo]

Magdalena how are you?

[Magdalena]

Magdalena how are you?

Ricardo! Hi. I'm fine. How are you?

I guess it's true...Be careful what you wish for. 

[Ricardo]

Magdalena how are you?

Ricardo! Hi. I'm fine. How are you?

I guess it's true...Be careful what you wish for. 

I did not understand ! explain better ?

[Magdalena]

Magdalena how are you?

Ricardo! Hi. I'm fine. How are you?

I guess it's true...Be careful what you wish for. 

I did not understand! explain better?

Your exclamation marks are hilarious. 

Oh, nothing, I was just talking to myself.

It's just that I "heard" something about you and I'm just wondering if it's true.

Ricardo has been around for a number of years now, using various names and avatars. He can still be seen in a few other forums under the name of Ricardo and using the same avatar he used here. He has posted in various chat forums, an astronomy forum, and a hobby forum. The more you feed him (and posters like him) the more he will reply,
...

-- That's all.
 

[Ricardo]

 
   Magdalena there are many ricards scattered throughout the forums.
are you all right ?

[Magdalena]

   Magdalena there are many ricards scattered throughout the forums.
are you all right ?

I'm sure there are many, ricards, scattered throughout the forums, I was just wondering about Ricardo. "The one who can still be seen in a few other forums under the name of Ricardo and using the same avatar he used here."

"Am I all right ?"
Yes, thank you for asking.

[Ricardo]

 the atheists' argument that there is a lack of empirical evidence for the existence of god can be refuted by the rationalism argument that everything that exists has an intelligible cause, even if that cause cannot be demonstrated empirically, such as the cause of origin. of the universe.

[Bluenose]

the atheists' argument that there is a lack of empirical evidence for the existence of god can be refuted by the rationalism argument that everything that exists has an intelligible cause, even if that cause cannot be demonstrated empirically, such as the cause of origin. of the universe.

Rubbish! If something cannot be demonstrated empirically, then by definition, there is a lack of empirical evidence for it.

[Magdalena]

the atheists' argument that there is...

Okay. Again.

[Tank]

the atheists' argument that there is a lack of empirical evidence for the existence of god can be refuted by the rationalism argument that everything that exists has an intelligible cause, even if that cause cannot be demonstrated empirically, such as the cause of origin. of the universe.

Not 'we' or 'our' or 'the atheist' but 'the atheists'. Take care with your terminology or you'll start looking like a theist troll.

[billy rubin]

the atheists' argument that there is a lack of empirical evidence for the existence of god can be refuted by the rationalism argument that everything that exists has an intelligible cause, even if that cause cannot be demonstrated empirically, such as the cause of origin. of the universe.

i believe the rationalism argument is refuted by the problem of induction.

all swans are white, until we see a black one.

what is the argument that demonstrates a cause is a requirement for existence?

[Tom62]

the atheists' argument that there is a lack of empirical evidence for the existence of god can be refuted by the rationalism argument that everything that exists has an intelligible cause, even if that cause cannot be demonstrated empirically, such as the cause of origin. of the universe.

i believe the rationalism argument is refuted by the problem of induction.

all swans are white, until we see a black one.

what is the argument that demonstrates a cause is a requirement for existence?

or that the cause has to be intelligible