Title: Nvm
Post by: klip on May 24, 2009, 05:30:00 PM
Post by: klip on May 24, 2009, 05:30:00 PM
EDIT: quote from http://jesus-chirst.blog.friendster.com ... rinciples/ (http://jesus-chirst.blog.friendster.com/2008/08/apologetics-first-principles/)
Title: Re: Proof of God: The First Principles
Post by: McQ on May 24, 2009, 05:35:47 PM
Post by: McQ on May 24, 2009, 05:35:47 PM
Welcome to the forum. Don't be shy, feel free to jump right in and express yourself!
Title: Re: Proof of God: The First Principles
Post by: curiosityandthecat on May 24, 2009, 05:43:38 PM
Post by: curiosityandthecat on May 24, 2009, 05:43:38 PM
Unless you own this blog (http://jesus-chirst.blog.friendster.com/2008/08/apologetics-first-principles/), you may want to cite your source, otherwise you won't be very welcome here.
Oh, and unless this is extremely tongue-in-cheek, you may want to change your worldview. The benefit of the doubt won't last long and I'll start revving up my ridicule engine.
Oh, and unless this is extremely tongue-in-cheek, you may want to change your worldview. The benefit of the doubt won't last long and I'll start revving up my ridicule engine.
Title: Re: Proof of God: The First Principles
Post by: Whitney on May 24, 2009, 11:02:11 PM
Post by: Whitney on May 24, 2009, 11:02:11 PM
Quote from: "curiosityandthecat"Oh, and unless this is extremely tongue-in-cheek, you may want to change your worldview. The benefit of the doubt won't last long and I'll start revving up my ridicule engine.
So...what was his worldview before he changed it to "ABC." ?
Title: Re: Proof of God: The First Principles
Post by: curiosityandthecat on May 24, 2009, 11:35:28 PM
Post by: curiosityandthecat on May 24, 2009, 11:35:28 PM
Quote from: "Whitney"Atheist.Quote from: "curiosityandthecat"Oh, and unless this is extremely tongue-in-cheek, you may want to change your worldview. The benefit of the doubt won't last long and I'll start revving up my ridicule engine.
So...what was his worldview before he changed it to "ABC." ?
Title: Re: Nvm
Post by: PipeBox on May 25, 2009, 03:24:45 AM
Post by: PipeBox on May 25, 2009, 03:24:45 AM
Maybe he's an atheist who happens to think the argument presented in that blog is watertight. Though, I would've expected him to convert if he honestly thought it was watertight, before running it by us. But more likely it's a Christian you just disparaged straight off HAF, Curio. 
Hey Klip, if you're still there, we don't actually bite... hard. In fact, welcome. That blog post has a lot wrong with it. I think the writer was making assumptions without realizing it, and there were a few logical fallacies, or at least gaps. I'd elaborate, but, and don't take this wrong, I don't think you'll be back, so it isn't necessary.
Hey Klip, if you're still there, we don't actually bite... hard. In fact, welcome. That blog post has a lot wrong with it. I think the writer was making assumptions without realizing it, and there were a few logical fallacies, or at least gaps. I'd elaborate, but, and don't take this wrong, I don't think you'll be back, so it isn't necessary.
Title: Re: Nvm
Post by: curiosityandthecat on May 25, 2009, 04:44:52 AM
Post by: curiosityandthecat on May 25, 2009, 04:44:52 AM
Quote from: "PipeBox"But more likely it's a Christian you just disparaged straight off HAF, Curio. ;) I had enough pasta for dinner... didn't need any more.
