In case of downtime/other tech emergencies, you can relatively quickly get in touch with Asmodean Prime by email.
Quote from: Icarus on Today at 06:12:46 AM My nation has some serious problems wrought by millions who know no better.
QuoteWhen the New York Times reported last week that Samuel Alito, an associate justice of the Supreme Court, had been flying an "Appeal to Heaven" flag at his vacation home on the New Jersey shore last summer, the legal world was confronted with yet another classic case of how to deal with the current warring textual methodologies for interpreting the law. One could either "read" this obscure-to-some pine-tree flag in the way the New York Times and its experts did—as a signifier of insurgent Christian nationalism. Or you could read it as a kind of benign 18th-century foam finger: "Gooooo George Washington!"
In the week since, most defenders of the flag have doubled down on the foam-finger defense. In much the same way they claim that the right to bear arms is codified in the Second Amendment and has not acquired any new popular understanding since ratification, they urge that the Appeal to Heaven flag means only what it meant to the founders, because history ended on that day. Welcome to the world of flag originalism, in which the only winning answer is ... 1775!
Most commentators understand that flags, like words, have changing meanings over time. "Until about a decade ago," notes the Times, "the Appeal to Heaven flag was mostly a historical relic." That meaning shifted fairly recently, when it was "revived to represent a theological vision of what the United States should be and how it should be governed," according to Matthew Taylor, a religion scholar at the Institute for Islamic, Christian, and Jewish Studies.
Per the Times, Dutch Sheets, a right-wing Christian author and speaker, and a leader in the New Apostolic Reformation, rediscovered the almost forgotten flag in 2013 "and made it the symbol of his ambitions to steep the country and the government in Christianity." As Sheets laid it out in his 2015 book: "Rally to the flag ... God has resurrected it for such a time as this. Wave it outwardly: wear it inwardly." Sheets has since made it his business to present the flag to people like Donald Trump, Sarah Palin, and others. When Trump lost in 2020, Sheets and "a team of others formed an instant, ad hoc religious arm of the 'Stop the Steal' campaign, blitzing swing state megachurches, broadcasting the services at each stop and drawing hundreds of thousands of viewers." At that moment, one might contend, were one being truthful, the flag took on a new, let's call it "evolving" meaning. And of course on Jan. 6, the Appeal to Heaven flags were everywhere. We know this because the Times has photos. As do others.
This suggests that a clear look at rather recent history reflects precisely what this flag means. But that assumes recent history holds value to you. The problem is that there is a second interpretive methodology being deployed to read the Appeal to Heaven flag. And, surprise! It's originalism. Mike Johnson, for instance, hung it at his office last fall shortly after becoming speaker of the House. A spokesman for Johnson explained, amid the outcry, that Johnson "has long appreciated the rich history of the flag, as it was first used by General George Washington during the Revolutionary War." Johnson himself told The Associated Press that he did not know the flag had come to represent the "Stop the Steal" movement. "Never heard that before," he said, because mumble, mumble, George-Washington-and-the-Sound-of-History roaring in his ears. Instead, as Johnson then explained, "I have always used that flag for as long as I can remember, because I was so enamored with the fact that Washington used it." Originalism Translator: Let's all agree to ignore the contemporary meaning of this flag in favor of broad, outlandish claims that the centuries-old meaning is the only reasonable one.
[Continues . . .]