Happy Atheist Forum

General => Current Events => Topic started by: billy rubin on May 14, 2023, 06:31:04 PM

Title: that royal side chick
Post by: billy rubin on May 14, 2023, 06:31:04 PM
whats up with this rose hanbury woman?

(https://i.imgur.com/Ks8KgJbl.jpg)

shes supposed to be prince wiliams mistress and is allover the non british tabloids.

when i search for her name on bbc and the guardian i get zero hits.

nada.

zero.

how come meghan markle is evrrywhere but rose hanbury is nowhere?

still looking
Title: Re: thatbroyal side chick
Post by: billy rubin on May 14, 2023, 06:36:16 PM
not even the sun

the mail mentions only that she has expensive shoes
Title: Re: that royal side chick
Post by: Tank on May 14, 2023, 07:50:03 PM
Interesting. Keep digging!
Title: Re: that royal side chick
Post by: Tank on May 14, 2023, 07:52:36 PM
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a27101934/prince-william-kate-middleton-affair-rumors-rose-hanbury-rural-rival/ (https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a27101934/prince-william-kate-middleton-affair-rumors-rose-hanbury-rural-rival/)
Title: Re: that royal side chick
Post by: Tank on May 14, 2023, 08:41:23 PM
Apparently there was a thing called a 'super injunction' covering this a while ago. Which seems to be falling apart now. My wife knows all this sort of royal gossip.

Super Injunction. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super-injunctions_in_English_law)

Title: Re: that royal side chick
Post by: billy rubin on May 14, 2023, 09:00:47 PM
QuoteIn English tort law, a super-injunction is a type of injunction that prevents publication of information that is in issue and also prevents the reporting of the fact that the injunction exists at all.[1] The term was coined by a Guardian journalist covering the 2006 Ivory Coast toxic waste dump controversy that had resulted in Trafigura obtaining a controversial injunction.[2] Due to their very nature media organisations are not able to report who has obtained a super-injunction without being in contempt of court. The term super-injunction has sometimes been used imprecisely in the media to refer to any anonymised privacy injunction preventing publication of private information. Critics of super-injunctions have argued that they stifle free speech, that they are ineffective as they can be breached using the Internet and social media and that the taking out of an injunction can have the unintended consequence of publicising the information more widely, a phenomenon known as the Streisand effect.

so there isnothing going on between william and rose hanbury, so much nothing in fact that its a crime to discuss it, and also a crime to mention that its a crime . . .

in america we quote shakespeare back at you brits on this stuff:

The lady doth protest too much, methinks

or in this case, the royal family who absolutely do not engage in pegging.

i had to look that up.
Title: Re: that royal side chick
Post by: Tank on May 14, 2023, 09:38:56 PM
As this site is hosted in the UK I don't think I can comment :rofl: