if there were no need for 'engineers from the quantum plenum' then we should not have any unanswered scientific questions.
Started by Sandra Craft, October 22, 2018, 11:24:37 PM
Quote from: Tank on January 28, 2019, 04:08:15 PMHow convenient you ignore the Laid Back Lounge with 150,000 posts.
Quote from: Tank on January 28, 2019, 05:17:08 PMObviously now any statistics you quote here will have no credibility whatsoever as you are evidently capable of twisting figures to suit yourself.
Quote from: xSilverPhinx on January 27, 2019, 08:55:48 PMScience is not about dogma, which is what you seem to want to instill in the 'debate'. An end-all definition that you find to adequately encompass atheists and atheism while not taking into consideration that atheists are a diverse group of people. Your view is too simplistic, and your 'solutions' are as well.
Quote from: SidewalkCynic on January 28, 2019, 09:11:17 PMQuote from: Tank on January 28, 2019, 05:17:08 PMObviously now any statistics you quote here will have no credibility whatsoever as you are evidently capable of twisting figures to suit yourself.I didn't even look at the numbers - I read the title and just disregarded it all togetherI don't have any credibility whatsoever around here, anyway. You are all inclined to adhere to what you have known to be true and are not inclined to question it, even though, you recognize that there is dispute and discrepancies in the definitions; and that the procedure for editing dictionaries is not so scientific as what some people are beginning to expect of dictionary definitions, because of the increased access to information and search for reliable references.