ChatGPT

[billy rubin]

thats better than the bean of chicago

[Asmodean]

It's also a very, very large, shiny... Seed.

[MarcusA]

Oils ain't oils. From an old Australian ad for car oil.

[billy rubin]

this interestin

Roberto Mata sued Avianca airlines for injuries he says he sustained from a serving cart while on the airline in 2019, claiming negligence by an employee. Steven Schwartz, an attorney with Levidow, Levidow & Oberman and licensed in New York for over three decades, handled Mata's representation.

But at least six of the submitted cases by Schwartz as research for a brief "appear to be bogus judicial decisions with bogus quotes and bogus internal citations," said Judge Kevin Castel of the Southern District of New York in an order.

The fake cases source? ChatGPT. 

a lawyer asked the AI forlegal cases to use in a filing, so the AI made some up.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/27/business/chat-gpt-avianca-mata-lawyers/index.html

heres the rub:

chatgpt has information, but no wisdom. how would an AI exercisr judgement, in detecting suspicious sourcr? as in the example above with microfossils, how would AI know the difference between a true interpretation, and just making shit up?

i am not impressed with AI precisely because of the judgement problem.