News:

Unnecessarily argumentative

Main Menu

Ban The Poster Above You

Started by The Magic Pudding, July 09, 2011, 02:08:09 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Arturo

It's Okay To Say You're Welcome
     Just let people be themselves.
     Arturo The1  リ壱

Nam

Humble? Banned for using incorrect word in description of my sentiment.

-Nam
I'm on the road less traveled...

Arturo

Banned because my excuse is text tones make it impossible to tell anyways
It's Okay To Say You're Welcome
     Just let people be themselves.
     Arturo The1  リ壱

Nam

I am banning the person below me for having the audacity to ban the person above them....WHO IS ME!!!!

-Nam
I'm on the road less traveled...

Ecurb Noselrub

Banned for pre-banning and failing to ban the person above you, in violation of Section 3.165 (a)(ii).

Magdalena

Wait a minute, Nam! You can't do that.  >:( >:(
If you ban someone before they ban you...that's like time travel, or something, and that's not allowed here. That's cheating! You can't use your Super Nam Powers, here!

"I've had several "spiritual" or numinous experiences over the years, but never felt that they were the product of anything but the workings of my own mind in reaction to the universe." ~Recusant

Sandra Craft

Banned for blinding me with science.
Sandy

  

"Life is short, and it is up to you to make it sweet."  Sarah Louise Delany

Magdalena

Quote from: Ecurb Noselrub on April 11, 2016, 10:32:25 PM
Banned for pre-banning and failing to ban the person above you, in violation of Section 3.165 (a)(ii).
I ban you for taking your, Guardian of Reason Title, waaaaayyyyy too serious.

"I've had several "spiritual" or numinous experiences over the years, but never felt that they were the product of anything but the workings of my own mind in reaction to the universe." ~Recusant

Magdalena

Quote from: BooksCatsEtc on April 11, 2016, 10:33:55 PM
Banned for blinding me with science.
Do you see what Nam did? Now I'm behind schedule.  :o
You guys are posting faster than I can ban.

"I've had several "spiritual" or numinous experiences over the years, but never felt that they were the product of anything but the workings of my own mind in reaction to the universe." ~Recusant

No one


Nam

Quote from: Magdalena on April 11, 2016, 10:33:07 PM
Wait a minute, Nam! You can't do that.  >:( >:(
If you ban someone before they ban you...that's like time travel, or something, and that's not allowed here. That's cheating! You can't use your Super Nam Powers, here!

Show me that rule.







Oh...I bend you o....um....ban you....my bad.

-Nam
I'm on the road less traveled...

Magdalena

Quote from: Nam on April 12, 2016, 12:40:43 AM
Show me that rule.







Oh...I bend you o....um....ban you....my bad.

-Nam












Quote from: No one on April 11, 2016, 11:40:04 PM
Double whammy ban.
Your wish is my command.  :grin:



Aqui va....



Quote from: Nam on April 12, 2016, 12:40:43 AM
Show me that rule.
Violation of Section 3.165 (a)(ii).
Quote from: Ecurb Noselrub on April 11, 2016, 10:32:25 PM
Banned for pre-banning and failing to ban the person above you, in violation of Section 3.165 (a)(ii).

Quote from: Nam on April 12, 2016, 12:40:43 AM
....my bad.



...Eww.

"I've had several "spiritual" or numinous experiences over the years, but never felt that they were the product of anything but the workings of my own mind in reaction to the universe." ~Recusant

No one

Much like a brook, you're babbling, therefore you receive a ban.

Magdalena

Calm down....

You're right.

I mean,
You're banned
for being right.

"I've had several "spiritual" or numinous experiences over the years, but never felt that they were the product of anything but the workings of my own mind in reaction to the universe." ~Recusant

Nam

Quote from: Magdalena on April 12, 2016, 02:25:26 AM
Your wish is my command.  :grin:



Aqui va....



Quote from: Nam on April 12, 2016, 12:40:43 AM
Show me that rule.
Violation of Section 3.165 (a)(ii).
Quote from: Ecurb Noselrub on April 11, 2016, 10:32:25 PM
Banned for pre-banning and failing to ban the person above you, in violation of Section 3.165 (a)(ii).

No, that I can't use my "Super Nam powers". Where's that rule?

;)

-Nam
I'm on the road less traveled...