News:

Nitpicky? Hell yes.

Main Menu

“I always Lie” and theories of consciousness

Started by fdesilva, April 08, 2010, 04:35:17 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

fdesilva

Quote from: "Whitney"You completely just made up 1 through 4; they are not constant across the board of god claims....they are terribly inconsistent with Hinduism and Buddhism.
Like I said on another thread, just like our understanding of physics, our understanding of the concept of God changes.

fdesilva

Quote from: "pinkocommie"
Quote from: "fdesilva"Lets make a new start.
You are looking at a compter screen.
Now how would you describe your conscious experiance while doing this?

description - I am looking at a computer screen.  And?
Lets say there is a blind person that feels the compter screen.
What similarities if any can you find in the word "feels" and "see" used in the 2 descriptions?

pinkocommie

Quote from: "fdesilva"
Quote from: "pinkocommie"
Quote from: "fdesilva"Lets make a new start.
You are looking at a compter screen.
Now how would you describe your conscious experiance while doing this?

description - I am looking at a computer screen.  And?
Lets say there is a blind person that feels the compter screen.
What similarities if any can you find in the word "feels" and "see" used in the 2 descriptions?

Both words contain two e's and an s.
Ubi dubium ibi libertas: Where there is doubt, there is freedom.
http://alliedatheistalliance.blogspot.com/

fdesilva

Quote from: "pinkocommie"Both words contain two e's and an s.
:) ok so you dont find any similarities in the usage of the words "feel" and "see".
How about this:
Would you consider you looking at a Computer screen an example of a consciouss experiance?
How about a camera on a trypod taking a photo of the screen based on a timer, would the camera be having a consciouss experiance?

pinkocommie

Quote from: "fdesilva"
Quote from: "pinkocommie"Both words contain two e's and an s.
:) ok so you dont find any similarities in the usage of the words "feel" and "see".
How about this:
Would you consider you looking at a Computer screen an example of a consciouss experiance?
How about a camera on a trypod taking a photo of the screen based on a timer, would the camera be having a consciouss experiance?

It would depend on what you mean by 'conscious experience'.
Ubi dubium ibi libertas: Where there is doubt, there is freedom.
http://alliedatheistalliance.blogspot.com/

pinkocommie

To be clear, I'm not trying to be intentionally difficult.  I just don't feel comfortable assuming that I know what you're trying to say considering your previous posts.
Ubi dubium ibi libertas: Where there is doubt, there is freedom.
http://alliedatheistalliance.blogspot.com/

fdesilva

Quote from: "pinkocommie"To be clear, I'm not trying to be intentionally difficult.  I just don't feel comfortable assuming that I know what you're trying to say considering your previous posts.
My understanding of what I mean by a "consciouss experiance" is what I gave by the 3 axioms at the start of this post. My guess is you dont agree with them. So why not tell me what your understanding of a "consciouss experiance" is and under that definition where the 2 cases fall. Thanks

karadan

Quote from: "fdesilva"
Quote from: "pinkocommie"To be clear, I'm not trying to be intentionally difficult.  I just don't feel comfortable assuming that I know what you're trying to say considering your previous posts.
My understanding of what I mean by a "consciouss experiance" is what I gave by the 3 axioms at the start of this post. My guess is you dont agree with them. So why not tell me what your understanding of a "consciouss experiance" is and under that definition where the 2 cases fall. Thanks


Does conscious experience even need to be clearly defined? Consciousness and experiences of consciousness are all relative seeing as we can easily alter our states of consciousness by sleeping or taking psychotropic drugs. Why should it require a clear definition?
QuoteI find it mistifying that in this age of information, some people still deny the scientific history of our existence.

pinkocommie

Considering the concept of consciousness is subjective, I could come up with several definitions for the term conscious experience.  Some would apply to both examples and others wouldn't apply to either one.
Ubi dubium ibi libertas: Where there is doubt, there is freedom.
http://alliedatheistalliance.blogspot.com/

fdesilva

Quote from: "karadan"Does conscious experience even need to be clearly defined? Consciousness and experiences of consciousness are all relative seeing as we can easily alter our states of consciousness by sleeping or taking psychotropic drugs. Why should it require a clear definition?
Yes,there are altered state of consciousness. By the same token there is also a state when you a person is said to be not consciouss. Now it may be possible to come up with a set of minimal properties that a consciouss state must have in order for it to be classified as such. However even if all of them dont have anything in common, it would be possible to take one example of a consciouss state, such as a person looking at a computer screen, and see what subjective properties it has and then see if it can be reproduced in some device.

fdesilva

Quote from: "pinkocommie"Considering the concept of consciousness is subjective, I could come up with several definitions for the term conscious experience.  Some would apply to both examples and others wouldn't apply to either one.
"Considering the concept of consciousness is subjective"
Yes, this is the big statement that seems to be in the way of studying consciousness for what it is. Please consider the following. Let's say I am studying the properties of water. Now you would say that the study of water is something objective, am I right? However I put it to you that it is as subjective, as the study of conscioussness. Let me explain.
Lets take 2 people engaged is the properties of water.
Person A, may say that it is a liquid and is colourless.
Person B,  may say the same or say if he/she as eyes that overly sensitive to part of the spectrum that it is green etc.
Now I put it to you that if A and B say the same thing, then what they are really saying is that  water induces the same conscious experience with regards to fluidity and colour.
Further and this is the key to the point I want to make.
If these 2 people were the only people in the universe. It is possible that from this study they will each come up with a list of properties. In this list lets say A says its colourless and B says no. Then they would conclude colour is subjective. So all the properties they can agree will be considered objective and those that they cannot would be subjective.
Please note that I am not saying that the water does not have any objective properties. The point I am making is that when person A is studying water, what A is studying is the model of the water created by and within its conscious experience. That model is very much as subjective to A as the “conscious experience” of A is subjective to A.

pinkocommie

Quote from: "fdesilva"
Quote from: "pinkocommie"Considering the concept of consciousness is subjective, I could come up with several definitions for the term conscious experience.  Some would apply to both examples and others wouldn't apply to either one.
"Considering the concept of consciousness is subjective"
Yes, this is the big statement that seems to be in the way of studying consciousness for what it is. Please consider the following. Let's say I am studying the properties of water. Now you would say that the study of water is something objective, am I right? However I put it to you that it is as subjective, as the study of conscioussness. Let me explain.
Lets take 2 people engaged is the properties of water.
Person A, may say that it is a liquid and is colourless.
Person B,  may say the same or say if he/she as eyes that overly sensitive to part of the spectrum that it is green etc.
Now I put it to you that if A and B say the same thing, then what they are really saying is that  water induces the same conscious experience with regards to fluidity and colour.
Further and this is the key to the point I want to make.
If these 2 people were the only people in the universe. It is possible that from this study they will each come up with a list of properties. In this list lets say A says its colourless and B says no. Then they would conclude colour is subjective. So all the properties they can agree will be considered objective and those that they cannot would be subjective.
Please note that I am not saying that the water does not have any objective properties. The point I am making is that when person A is studying water, what A is studying is the model of the water created by and within its conscious experience. That model is very much as subjective to A as the “conscious experience” of A is subjective to A.

I don't think your analogy works.  Water is a physical thing.  Consciousness is a concept.  The model of the water is still a model of a physical thing which can be quantified.  Consciousness is not quantifiable in any form.  A model of your idea of consciousness doesn't make the concept of consciousness any more quantifiable.
Ubi dubium ibi libertas: Where there is doubt, there is freedom.
http://alliedatheistalliance.blogspot.com/

fdesilva

Quote from: "pinkocommie"I don't think your analogy works.  Water is a physical thing.  Consciousness is a concept.  The model of the water is still a model of a physical thing which can be quantified.  Consciousness is not quantifiable in any form.  A model of your idea of consciousness doesn't make the concept of consciousness any more quantifiable.
Are you saying this
“Consciousness is not quantifiable in any form”
Because
“Consciousness is a concept.”
?

pinkocommie

Quote from: "fdesilva"
Quote from: "pinkocommie"I don't think your analogy works.  Water is a physical thing.  Consciousness is a concept.  The model of the water is still a model of a physical thing which can be quantified.  Consciousness is not quantifiable in any form.  A model of your idea of consciousness doesn't make the concept of consciousness any more quantifiable.
Are you saying this
“Consciousness is not quantifiable in any form”
Because
“Consciousness is a concept.”
?

Consciousness is not quantifiable because consciousness is a non physical concept.
Ubi dubium ibi libertas: Where there is doubt, there is freedom.
http://alliedatheistalliance.blogspot.com/

pinkocommie

Ubi dubium ibi libertas: Where there is doubt, there is freedom.
http://alliedatheistalliance.blogspot.com/