if there were no need for 'engineers from the quantum plenum' then we should not have any unanswered scientific questions.
Started by Tank, December 07, 2021, 12:06:32 PM
Quote from: billy rubin on December 13, 2021, 05:38:07 PMwell, youre right, of course.but i always scrutinize what im doing anyway. part of trying to live an intentional life. so long as indecision isnt part of it, i reasonably happy with how im doing.traditional conservativve quaker practice includes a lot of wat i call indecision-- the default is to not move forward without a positive leading in favor of that action or direction. quakers who practice that are referred to as slow. im the othe end, because im a fast quaker-- i believe that not making a decision is to make a decision, and so reflexive slowness isnt a positive course, on its own.traditional slow quakers will stand around on a sinking ship debating whether to use the lifeboats or the life vests, whereas a fast quaker will say, get into whatever is closest and worry about the leading after.the correct path is to mix input of both types, but the slow quakers are slow about that too. i end up just working on my own behind their backs and letting them catch up.
Quote from: Bad Penny II on December 14, 2021, 11:20:20 AMWell done Sir.Most here got many of their numbers when the forum was brimming with life.You got yours revivifying a near flatlining forum, Good Job
Quote from: billy rubin on December 14, 2021, 10:58:36 PM...my post was immediately relocated to tbe junk post threads under a new mocking gibberish thread title....