BDSM Test

[Arturo]

Below is a test to see which types of BDSM you are into and to what percentage. The higher the percentage, the more you're into that category. It's a fun little quiz to play around with and embarrass yourself.

http://www.bdsmtest.org/

These are my results. I dare you to show yours. If you don't know what anything means, you can click "more info".

[Pasta Chick]

Not remotely embarrassing and anyone wholly surprised by this doesn't  know me half as well as they think they do.

Results

[Davin]

Like with every kind of questionnaire, I had problems answering the questions, but these are my results:

http://www.bdsmtest.org/result.php?id=4954157

[hermes2015]

Well, this is me:

http://bdsmtest.org/result.php?id=4954359

Can't say it was a surprise to me.

[Arturo]

Not remotely embarrassing and anyone wholly surprised by this doesn't  know me half as well as they think they do.

Results

That's pretty extreme PastaChick. My other friends took this test and they all said I had the weirdest one (besides a guy who got 100% on everything except vanilla)

[Magdalena]

OK. That was weird. 

Let's just say that I'm not into BDSM. I'm no sadist, rigger, rope bunny, or a non-monogamist. (Those were at the bottom of my list). But according to the test, (I am 100 %): an exhibitionist, primal (prey), and and a voyeur. 

[Pasta Chick]

Like with every kind of questionnaire, I had problems answering the questions, but these are my results:

http://www.bdsmtest.org/result.php?id=4954157

I had that issue too... It's hard to tell if some questions are about fantasy or real behavior - for instance there are a lot of exhibitionist/voyer scenarios that are theoretically appealing, but hinge upon the non-consensual involvement of at least one person. That's a line I won't cross.

Also, things that just don't matter either way ... I'm not -not- going to get involved over a significant age difference but I'm not specifically in to that either.

[Arturo]

OK. That was weird. 

Let's just say that I'm not into BDSM. I'm no sadist, rigger, rope bunny, or a non-monogamist. (Those were at the bottom of my list). But according to the test, (I am 100 %): an exhibitionist, primal (prey), and and a voyeur. 

I clearly hang out with the wrong people if I want to keep a pet.

[Davin]

Like with every kind of questionnaire, I had problems answering the questions, but these are my results:

http://www.bdsmtest.org/result.php?id=4954157

I had that issue too... It's hard to tell if some questions are about fantasy or real behavior - for instance there are a lot of exhibitionist/voyer scenarios that are theoretically appealing, but hinge upon the non-consensual involvement of at least one person. That's a line I won't cross.

Also, things that just don't matter either way ... I'm not -not- going to get involved over a significant age difference but I'm not specifically in to that either.

Yes, I had trouble with those questions as well. As far as consent goes, Everyone involved must consent, that is the line I will never cross.

And most of the questions were things I just don't care one way or the other about. I feel the same about age differences.

I also had a problem with the pain questions, because pain doesn't turn me on or off, it doesn't really affect me one way or the other. It is the same with degrading talk, it doesn't bother me if I'm the subject of it but I would feel bad if I was the one delivering it. It doesn't excite me and it also doesn't spoil the mood.

[Davin]

OK. That was weird. 

Let's just say that I'm not into BDSM. I'm no sadist, rigger, rope bunny, or a non-monogamist. (Those were at the bottom of my list). But according to the test, (I am 100 %): an exhibitionist, primal (prey), and and a voyeur. 

I honestly don't know why it put me so low on the monogamist rating. I've never been anything but. But I have no issues if other people are not and that is what the questions about those things looked like.

[Biggus Dickus]

OK. That was weird. 

Let's just say that I'm not into BDSM. I'm no sadist, rigger, rope bunny, or a non-monogamist. (Those were at the bottom of my list). But according to the test, (I am 100 %): an exhibitionist, primal (prey), and and a voyeur. 

I believe that is normal for nuns,...

[Magdalena]

Like with every kind of questionnaire, I had problems answering the questions, but these are my results:

http://www.bdsmtest.org/result.php?id=4954157

I had that issue too... It's hard to tell if some questions are about fantasy or real behavior - for instance there are a lot of exhibitionist/voyer scenarios that are theoretically appealing, but hinge upon the non-consensual involvement of at least one person. That's a line I won't cross.

Also, things that just don't matter either way ... I'm not -not- going to get involved over a significant age difference but I'm not specifically in to that either.

Yes, I had trouble with those questions as well. As far as consent goes, Everyone involved must consent, that is the line I will never cross.

And most of the questions were things I just don't care one way or the other about. I feel the same about age differences.

I also had a problem with the pain questions, because pain doesn't turn me on or off, it doesn't really affect me one way or the other. It is the same with degrading talk, it doesn't bother me if I'm the subject of it but I would feel bad if I was the one delivering it. It doesn't excite me and it also doesn't spoil the mood.

Yes. Some of the questions are confusing. I assumed the exhibitionist/voyeur scenarios are with the person you're with and those who are watching are there because they want to watch. If you don't have a significant other the whole thing falls into fantasy. If you're in a monogamous relationship why would you say yes to this?

If I could not fulfill all of my partner's sexual desires, I would encourage them to see other people to fill the gaps.

If I answer yes, the monogamy goes out the window. If I answer no, like Father Bruno said, "I believe that is normal for nuns."
Also, why would my man encourage me to see other people to "fill the gaps?" 

I agree with PC, "Everyone involved must consent." I wouldn't want to watch someone do "stuff" without their consent, and I wouldn't show "my stuff" to people who wouldn't enjoy watching.

[Magdalena]

I clearly hang out with the wrong people if I want to keep a pet.

You want to keep a pet, Arturo?

[xSilverPhinx]

OK. That was weird. 

Let's just say that I'm not into BDSM. I'm no sadist, rigger, rope bunny, or a non-monogamist. (Those were at the bottom of my list). But according to the test, (I am 100 %): an exhibitionist, primal (prey), and and a voyeur. 

I clearly hang out with the wrong people if I want to keep a pet.

A "pet" like this?

[Pasta Chick]

Like with every kind of questionnaire, I had problems answering the questions, but these are my results:

http://www.bdsmtest.org/result.php?id=4954157

I had that issue too... It's hard to tell if some questions are about fantasy or real behavior - for instance there are a lot of exhibitionist/voyer scenarios that are theoretically appealing, but hinge upon the non-consensual involvement of at least one person. That's a line I won't cross.

Also, things that just don't matter either way ... I'm not -not- going to get involved over a significant age difference but I'm not specifically in to that either.

Yes, I had trouble with those questions as well. As far as consent goes, Everyone involved must consent, that is the line I will never cross.

And most of the questions were things I just don't care one way or the other about. I feel the same about age differences.

I also had a problem with the pain questions, because pain doesn't turn me on or off, it doesn't really affect me one way or the other. It is the same with degrading talk, it doesn't bother me if I'm the subject of it but I would feel bad if I was the one delivering it. It doesn't excite me and it also doesn't spoil the mood.

Yes. Some of the questions are confusing. I assumed the exhibitionist/voyeur scenarios are with the person you're with and those who are watching are there because they want to watch. If you don't have a significant other the whole thing falls into fantasy. If you're in a monogamous relationship why would you say yes to this?

Totally depends - there's an exhibitionist couple who runs their own porn channel online and it's pretty much just the two of them in every video. Other people are in to watching or being watched by their partner while they're with a third (or more) party. Sometimes with criteria, sometimes not.

If I could not fulfill all of my partner's sexual desires, I would encourage them to see other people to fill the gaps.

If I answer yes, the monogamy goes out the window. If I answer no, like Father Bruno said, "I believe that is normal for nuns."
Also, why would my man encourage me to see other people to "fill the gaps?" 

I agree with PC, "Everyone involved must consent." I wouldn't want to watch someone do "stuff" without their consent, and I wouldn't show "my stuff" to people who wouldn't enjoy watching.

If one of you were, say, super in to anal play while dressed like a dog. And the other had no interest in either activity.

It helps to understand a lot of people in the BDSM community tend toward fluid sexual identities and are not wholly monogamous. Plenty are solidly straight or gay and completely monogamous too, but it's very common not to be.