The Daily Mail
"banned" Wikipedia years ago, according to the article.
A spokesman for Mail Newspapers said that only a tiny portion of the site’s millions of anonymous editors had been involved in the decision, adding: 'It is hard to know whether to laugh or cry at this move by Wikipedia. For the record the Daily Mail banned all its journalists from using Wikipedia as a sole source in 2014 because of its unreliability."
His other comment was spurious, and typical Mail
speak which I think was aimed at its devoted readership rather than the public in general.
"All those people who believe in freedom of expression should be profoundly concerned at this cynical politically motivated attempt to stifle the free press."
As if Wikipedia were attempting to stifle the free press. Reminds me a bit of Christians in the US who rage about how the government is repressing them.