The place where male fantasy and medical advice meet.

[Sweetdeath]

he's looking at them, not having sex with them.  There is no excuse, really.


off topic: new icon = <3

I've gotten bored with a few things by looking. I don't think it is fair to expect men to want vagina all the time.


Thanks. It made me laugh.

I dont think it's fair to be with someone for just one thing either. 

[Buddy]

I dont think it's fair to be with someone for just one thing either. 

You're right, it's not fair to be with someone for one thing. But a majority of times, people get married because they love more than one thing about each other. Going to marriage counseling just because they are not having sex seems pathetic. If they really loved each other they would be able to talk about it and the wife would be able understand why the gynecologist did not want sex. Something tells me that there were underlying issues.

[hismikeness]

I had a buddy who worked at a pizza place for a couple of years during college, on the front line making the pizzas. He hates it now, though after ten years or so he can at least tolerate it. Is that kind of the same thing?

More to the original topic: I will try and dig up the research I read stating that immune antibodies that the male had developed could be passed through the semen to the child, and with enough "exposure" to the mother as well. It was inside of research regarding humans being attracted to those with immune system traits that complimented their own immune system's deficiencies, as a means to produce healthier offspring. Pheromones were what passed the information. So essentially stink and sperm is what makes healthy babies? Or is that too simplistic?? 

[Tank]

This reminds me of a study I saw a few years ago suggesting there were health benefits for women who ingest their partner's semen. If I am not mistaken there was a reduced risk of breast cancer. But a big part of me thinks the researchers were a bunch of perverts who guessed no one would do a follow up study. Imagine the ad for test subjects! You couldn't place it in the paper!

I used to be a rep for a components company and visited the labs at the Institute of Psychiatry in London. Now there was a TV programme that investigated the question of female stimulation by pornography. With a man they put a strain gauge around his penis. But how do you measure response in a woman? Well I happened to visit the lab and the technician that was given the job. The equipment turned out to be very simple it was a about the size of a medium cigar and contained a series of red LEDS set at 90 degrees to matching detectors. As the blood flow in the vaginal wall increased the amount of light passing between LED and detector increased; very simple. The guy admitted he'd got it working in 3 days but had claimed it had been terribly difficult to calibrate and as such had needed lots of volunteers to test the device on (which was BS). He had notes on the response curves of over 300 nurses at the hospital!

My careers teacher never told me there were jobs like that.

They never do, do they.

I believe I read somewhere that male gynaecologists often end up in marriage counselling because they see so many vaginas the loose interest in their wives.

those are some sad and pathetic men 

I think you need to explain your reasoning behind that comment. Labelling a person as 'sad or pathetic' because of the work they do is rather thoughtless.

[Tank]

those are some sad and pathetic men 

I disagree. If someone ate Chinese food every day for the rest of their life, they would probably soon grow tired of it. The same could probably be said for vaginas.

he's looking at them, not having sex with them.  There is no excuse, really.


off topic: new icon = <3

Have you not considered the fact that the issue may be that they can't see their wife any more except in the context of just another vagina? And why are you having a go at a group of people who have a recognised problem as simply 'buck your ideas up sunshine; be a man'.

[En_Route]

This reminds me of a study I saw a few years ago suggesting there were health benefits for women who ingest their partner's semen. If I am not mistaken there was a reduced risk of breast cancer. But a big part of me thinks the researchers were a bunch of perverts who guessed no one would do a follow up study. Imagine the ad for test subjects! You couldn't place it in the paper!

I used to be a rep for a components company and visited the labs at the Institute of Psychiatry in London. Now there was a TV programme that investigated the question of female stimulation by pornography. With a man they put a strain gauge around his penis. But how do you measure response in a woman? Well I happened to visit the lab and the technician that was given the job. The equipment turned out to be very simple it was a about the size of a medium cigar and contained a series of red LEDS set at 90 degrees to matching detectors. As the blood flow in the vaginal wall increased the amount of light passing between LED and detector increased; very simple. The guy admitted he'd got it working in 3 days but had claimed it had been terribly difficult to calibrate and as such had needed lots of volunteers to test the device on (which was BS). He had notes on the response curves of over 300 nurses at the hospital!

My careers teacher never told me there were jobs like that.

They never do, do they.

I believe I read somewhere that male gynaecologists often end up in marriage counselling because they see so many vaginas the loose interest in their wives.

those are some sad and pathetic men 

I think you need to explain your reasoning behind that comment. Labelling a person as 'sad or pathetic' because of the work they do is rather thoughtless.

That's a trap I'd never fall into 

[En_Route]

those are some sad and pathetic men  

I disagree. If someone ate Chinese food every day for the rest of their life, they would probably soon grow tired of it. The same could probably be said for vaginas.

Eating them every day would make you grow tired of them? Again, Research  is called for and in the interests of science I am selflessly prepared to offer myself as a volunteer.

[Tank]

I think you need to explain your reasoning behind that comment. Labelling a person as 'sad or pathetic' because of the work they do is rather thoughtless.

That's a trap I'd never fall into 

Well it is opened in the sense that it asks for more information 

[DeterminedJuliet]

those are some sad and pathetic men 

I disagree. If someone ate Chinese food every day for the rest of their life, they would probably soon grow tired of it. The same could probably be said for vaginas.

he's looking at them, not having sex with them.  There is no excuse, really.


off topic: new icon = <3

Have you not considered the fact that the issue may be that they can't see their wife any more except in the context of just another vagina? And why are you having a go at a group of people who have a recognised problem as simply 'buck your ideas up sunshine; be a man'.

Yes. Exactly.

[Sweetdeath]

I dont think it's fair to be with someone for just one thing either. 

You're right, it's not fair to be with someone for one thing. But a majority of times, people get married because they love more than one thing about each other. Going to marriage counseling just because they are not having sex seems pathetic. If they really loved each other they would be able to talk about it and the wife would be able understand why the gynecologist did not want sex. Something tells me that there were underlying issues.

Yeah :<
I mean, i seriously have tons in common with my girlfriend. I couldn't be with someone just because they were pretty or the sex was the good. That's a nice foundation for a short relationship.

[Sandra Craft]

those are some sad and pathetic men 

I disagree. If someone ate Chinese food every day for the rest of their life, they would probably soon grow tired of it. The same could probably be said for vaginas.

he's looking at them, not having sex with them.  There is no excuse, really.


off topic: new icon = <3

Have you not considered the fact that the issue may be that they can't see their wife any more except in the context of just another vagina? And why are you having a go at a group of people who have a recognised problem as simply 'buck your ideas up sunshine; be a man'.

Yes. Exactly.

I don't know -- I'm having a hard time understanding why looking at pussy all day would put a man off sex with a wife or girlfriend.  I can understand why a man might not want to look at another one, but that's hardly required for sex and there's a lot more to it than that.  I guess what I don't understand is turning down an offer to just close your eyes, lie back and have an orgasm no matter what you've been looking at all day at work.

[Tank]

those are some sad and pathetic men 

I disagree. If someone ate Chinese food every day for the rest of their life, they would probably soon grow tired of it. The same could probably be said for vaginas.

he's looking at them, not having sex with them.  There is no excuse, really.


off topic: new icon = <3

Have you not considered the fact that the issue may be that they can't see their wife any more except in the context of just another vagina? And why are you having a go at a group of people who have a recognised problem as simply 'buck your ideas up sunshine; be a man'.

Yes. Exactly.

I don't know -- I'm having a hard time understanding why looking at pussy all day would put a man off sex with a wife or girlfriend.  I can understand why a man might not want to look at another one, but that's hardly required for sex and there's a lot more to it than that.  I guess what I don't understand is turning down an offer to just close your eyes, lie back and have an orgasm no matter what you've been looking at all day at work.

I must say I can't see the problem myself and I remeber being surprised when I read the article.

[En_Route]

This reminds me of a study I saw a few years ago suggesting there were health benefits for women who ingest their partner's semen. If I am not mistaken there was a reduced risk of breast cancer. But a big part of me thinks the researchers were a bunch of perverts who guessed no one would do a follow up study. Imagine the ad for test subjects! You couldn't place it in the paper!

I used to be a rep for a components company and visited the labs at the Institute of Psychiatry in London. Now there was a TV programme that investigated the question of female stimulation by pornography. With a man they put a strain gauge around his penis. But how do you measure response in a woman? Well I happened to visit the lab and the technician that was given the job. The equipment turned out to be very simple it was a about the size of a medium cigar and contained a series of red LEDS set at 90 degrees to matching detectors. As the blood flow in the vaginal wall increased the amount of light passing between LED and detector increased; very simple. The guy admitted he'd got it working in 3 days but had claimed it had been terribly difficult to calibrate and as such had needed lots of volunteers to test the device on (which was BS). He had notes on the response curves of over 300 nurses at the hospital!

My careers teacher never told me there were jobs like that.

They never do, do they.

I believe I read somewhere that male gynaecologists often end up in marriage counselling because they see so many vaginas the loose interest in their wives.

Surely the solution is for them to practise anal sex. Obvious once you think about it. Which I do occasionally.

[Sweetdeath]

This reminds me of a study I saw a few years ago suggesting there were health benefits for women who ingest their partner's semen. If I am not mistaken there was a reduced risk of breast cancer. But a big part of me thinks the researchers were a bunch of perverts who guessed no one would do a follow up study. Imagine the ad for test subjects! You couldn't place it in the paper!

I used to be a rep for a components company and visited the labs at the Institute of Psychiatry in London. Now there was a TV programme that investigated the question of female stimulation by pornography. With a man they put a strain gauge around his penis. But how do you measure response in a woman? Well I happened to visit the lab and the technician that was given the job. The equipment turned out to be very simple it was a about the size of a medium cigar and contained a series of red LEDS set at 90 degrees to matching detectors. As the blood flow in the vaginal wall increased the amount of light passing between LED and detector increased; very simple. The guy admitted he'd got it working in 3 days but had claimed it had been terribly difficult to calibrate and as such had needed lots of volunteers to test the device on (which was BS). He had notes on the response curves of over 300 nurses at the hospital!

My careers teacher never told me there were jobs like that.

They never do, do they.

I believe I read somewhere that male gynaecologists often end up in marriage counselling because they see so many vaginas the loose interest in their wives.

those are some sad and pathetic men 

I think you need to explain your reasoning behind that comment. Labelling a person as 'sad or pathetic' because of the work they do is rather thoughtless.

i'm sorry, Tank. I'm only saying a person who is tired of their wife or doesnt want to have sex with her just because they have this job is a sad excuse. I mean, i work with perfume all day,  but that doesn't mean i don't want to smell nice when i go outside.


I don't know, it just makes me feel someone who thinks this way didn't respect their wife to begin with.

[Sweetdeath]

those are some sad and pathetic men 

I disagree. If someone ate Chinese food every day for the rest of their life, they would probably soon grow tired of it. The same could probably be said for vaginas.

he's looking at them, not having sex with them.  There is no excuse, really.


off topic: new icon = <3

Have you not considered the fact that the issue may be that they can't see their wife any more except in the context of just another vagina? And why are you having a go at a group of people who have a recognised problem as simply 'buck your ideas up sunshine; be a man'.

That isn't what i am saying at all.