News:

Nitpicky? Hell yes.

Main Menu

Responsible Breeding?

Started by Dobermonster, February 21, 2012, 05:12:21 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Dobermonster

I know I'm risking some flack for that particular term, but I wanted to explore this thought: Have you ever considered not having children due to illness which may have a strong hereditary factor (or indeed, entirely genetic)? It's something I've thought about from time to time, and being an avid dog person, the concept of "responsible breeding" (especially in regards to health) comes up quite frequently in the field - hence the title. Please note this is not a topic on restricting rights of procreation, just as a personal choice. What severity and loss to quality of life would you consider to be too great to risk? What level of risk (e.g. 50% or more)?

The Magic Pudding

An awful disability rated at 100 x a probability of 1% = 1
Deafness rated at 5 x a probability of 20% = 1

A result over 1 could be considered to risky, how you actually rate the disability would be a personal thing.

Whitney

I'm not aware of any family history that puts us at higher risk of having a child with a horrible illness.  But I plan on doing some minimal genetics testing to make sure we aren't at high risk of some of the major untreatable stuff.  Then there is also testing that can be done during pregnancy and they can detect things a lot earlier now than they could not too long ago (things like downs can be picked up by blood samples now rather than amneosynthesis..not sure how it works though, just read something about it briefly).  I will not bring a child into the world knowing that s/he will have some large disability that makes independence or quality of life impossible...it's not fair to the child to make them go through that when they wouldn't have to and I just don't' think I have it in me to deal with a special needs for the rest of someone's life.

Sweetdeath

Don't worry, Dober. Not many of us are offended.
I've thought of this topic a lot. I think everyone should   be screened if they are thinking of kids. Play it safe, right?
Personally, having kids is overated, especially considering how many people infest this earth.
Meh, that's just me.
Law 35- "You got to go with what works." - Robin Lefler

Wiggum:"You have that much faith in me, Homer?"
Homer:"No! Faith is what you have in things that don't exist. Your awesomeness is real."

"I was thinking that perhaps this thing called God does not exist. Because He cannot save any one of us. No matter how we pray, He doesn't mend our wounds.

Ali

Interesting question.  I didn't know until I got pregnant with T, but apparently I am a carrier for the Cystic Fibrosis gene.  That one came out of left field, it is just part of the standard testing that my ob does when you get pregnant.  Following that, we got Husband tested, and found out that he is not a carrier, so T may also be a carrier, but he was not at risk for the actual disease.  If it had turned out that Husband was also a carrier, we would not have terminated, but we wouldn't have gone on to have more children either. 

DeterminedJuliet

My husband is from Newfoundland, my mom's family is from Nova Scotia and my Dad was born in Montreal (one of his parents was french and the other was a Brit), so I knew our son's genes were going to be relatively diverse. Newfoundland itself has a pretty small gene pool (one of my husband's grandmother's had a really rare disorder due to this fact), so, I think, if I had actually been born there and my parents had been from there I would have seriously considered testing.

As it stood, I was 24 when I got pregnant and both my husband and I had been pretty healthy most of our lives without any really apparent issues in our immediate family so we decided to "roll the dice", as it were.
"We've thought of life by analogy with a journey, with pilgrimage which had a serious purpose at the end, and the THING was to get to that end; success, or whatever it is, or maybe heaven after you're dead. But, we missed the point the whole way along; It was a musical thing and you were supposed to sing, or dance, while the music was being played.

En_Route

With the alleged wisdom of age, I think now I should have at least posed the question- do I really want to be responsible for producing another me? Fortunately for them (and me) they in fact avoided that dire fate.
Some ideas are so stupid only an intellectual could believe them (Orwell).

Sweetdeath

Quote from: En_Route on February 21, 2012, 11:17:35 PM
With the alleged wisdom of age, I think now I should have at least posed the question- do I really want to be responsible for producing another me? Fortunately for them (and me) they in fact avoided that dire fate.
not only does the idea of having a child physically repulse me, I know I am not only not nuturing , but too selfish to think about diapers, food, schooling , and everything else it takes to raise another human being.   
Law 35- "You got to go with what works." - Robin Lefler

Wiggum:"You have that much faith in me, Homer?"
Homer:"No! Faith is what you have in things that don't exist. Your awesomeness is real."

"I was thinking that perhaps this thing called God does not exist. Because He cannot save any one of us. No matter how we pray, He doesn't mend our wounds.

Dobermonster

Quote from: Sweetdeath on February 22, 2012, 12:00:26 AM
Quote from: En_Route on February 21, 2012, 11:17:35 PM
With the alleged wisdom of age, I think now I should have at least posed the question- do I really want to be responsible for producing another me? Fortunately for them (and me) they in fact avoided that dire fate.
not only does the idea of having a child physically repulse me, I know I am not only not nuturing , but too selfish to think about diapers, food, schooling , and everything else it takes to raise another human being.   

I like the idea of raising a human being from infancy to adulthood. Part of it has to do with my fascination about the world, and I like the idea of passing on this fascination, teaching and nurturing and eventually finding out what sort of human came out of my genetics and muddling attempts at child-raising. I also confess to liking the idea that half of me lives on after my death - not referring to just genes, but also in their values, memories, and (hopefully) eternal curiosity. It's a selfish and biological motivation, and I haven't decided on whether it's something that if I didn't do, I would regret.

What I also consider is the hereditary illnesses that I have . . . these things have not only set me back in life, but have made living a lot harder (not nearly as hard as some, but still). And it's likely to get harder yet, as I get older. I do not regret being born, though, and I am happy to have the opportunity to live. Do I risk fulfilling an essentially selfish motivation, knowing the high possibility that my offspring may face the same difficulties? Is this very different from those who 'roll the dice', not quite knowing the odds? I try not to live my life by 'what ifs', but there's enough on the list that I've regretted already.

Ali

Kate, in my admittedly limited experience (only have one, and he's only almost 4) raising a child is one of the most appealing and fulfilling ways to spend time I can think of.  Selfish or not, I can't even tell you how cool I think it is.  He's currently been wearing his Batman mask for 3 straight days and counting (and insisting that everyone call him Batman) and I couldn't be more charmed.

I fully agree that if someone thinks that raising a child is not for them, they should avoid it.  Raising a kid basically means that you never get to sleep in or watch adult themed movies before 8:30 pm or spend the day laying on the couch reading a book.  It's a big job, not for the queasy of tummy or faint of heart, and if someone is not up for it, I fully encourage them to skip it.  But for those of us who want and like it, it's awesome.  I think it's supposed to be - it's built into most of our genes, or else the species would have died out a long time ago.

En_Route

Some ideas are so stupid only an intellectual could believe them (Orwell).

pytheas

Quote from: Dobermonster on February 21, 2012, 05:12:21 AMWhat severity and loss to quality of life would you consider to be too great to risk? What level of risk (e.g. 50% or more)?

Well, many conditions can be restored, regenerated or substituted adequately.

nasty conditions with 100% lethality before adulthood- so misery and pain for childhood, qualify clearly

legs, arms, sight, hearing handicaps do not qualify, an otherwise healthy CNS evolves and expands to miraculous new territories

mental retardation, neurological disorders is a tricky one. I can't say with percentages none qualify. If you can relate to a pet iguana or a pet snake, or be a companion to a dog,  a retarded kid may not be such an abomination
"Not what we have But what we enjoy, constitutes our abundance."
"Freedom is the greatest fruit of self-sufficiency"
"Nothing is enough for the man to whom enough is too little."
by EPICURUS 4th century BCE

Amicale

I got pregnant at 22, back when my life was a lot more stable, I had a much better income, and things were more balanced in a lot of ways. At the time, it made perfect sense... as things only can when you're in your early 20s.  :D  I chose to have her a bit earlier, because of a family history of pregnancy issues past the age of 25 or so. My kiddo is also nearly 4, and she's the joy of my life. I got pregnant deliberately -- without going into details, let's just say I had to methodically make choices I wouldn't ordinarily make in order to have her, but it was more than worth it. :) Her dad is one of my best friends, and he adores her as much as I do. Our decision at the time worked for us, and it's still working now, very well. She's funny, smart, very cute, and just an awesome little girl. 

That being said, he and I had serious conversations about whether or not to even try for a child. Depression runs in our families, but we decided that since it's treatable, there wasn't enough of a risk to choose not to have a child. Cancer runs in my family, and it runs in his. We've both lost more than a couple relatives to it. We made the choice to go ahead anyhow though, because anyone in our families who had cancer developed it after the age of 50. No childhood diseases, nothing that would claim a young person's life in their mid 20s or 30s. When it came right down to it, we both agreed that we would NOT go ahead with a pregnancy if something excruciatingly painful or delibitating were discovered -- it wouldn't be fair to our child. We didn't think it right to go ahead and have a child if her childhood would likely be stolen from her, if she'd have a life of pain and agony. Thankfully, nothing at all was discovered that would be problematic... so we went ahead, and we celebrated when she was born.

Looking back on it all, now, I wonder about the depression risk. I wonder about the cancer risk. I wonder if we were selfish, to want a child who might have an ordinary life for the most part but might still struggle with these issues later on. Maybe we were selfish, but we wanted to share our love of kids and life with a child, so... I think our hearts were in the right place. When it comes down to it, a lot of families are affected by these common issues, anyhow, and most families go ahead and have kids anyway. I don't know. All I know is that I don't regret my choice. If there is such a thing as having a 'calling' in life... being her mommy's it for me, until the day I die.


"Our lives are not our own. From womb to tomb we are bound to others. By every crime and act of kindness we birth our future." - Cloud Atlas

"To live in the hearts of those we leave behind is to never die." -Carl Sagan

Tank

We all die of illness, accident or old age in the end. So roll the dice.
If religions were TV channels atheism is turning the TV off.
"Religion is a culture of faith; science is a culture of doubt." ― Richard P. Feynman
'It is said that your life flashes before your eyes just before you die. That is true, it's called Life.' - Terry Pratchett
Remember, your inability to grasp science is not a valid argument against it.

Dobermonster

Quote from: Amicale on March 17, 2012, 05:39:09 AM
I got pregnant at 22, back when my life was a lot more stable, I had a much better income, and things were more balanced in a lot of ways. At the time, it made perfect sense... as things only can when you're in your early 20s.  :D  I chose to have her a bit earlier, because of a family history of pregnancy issues past the age of 25 or so. My kiddo is also nearly 4, and she's the joy of my life. I got pregnant deliberately -- without going into details, let's just say I had to methodically make choices I wouldn't ordinarily make in order to have her, but it was more than worth it. :) Her dad is one of my best friends, and he adores her as much as I do. Our decision at the time worked for us, and it's still working now, very well. She's funny, smart, very cute, and just an awesome little girl. 

That being said, he and I had serious conversations about whether or not to even try for a child. Depression runs in our families, but we decided that since it's treatable, there wasn't enough of a risk to choose not to have a child. Cancer runs in my family, and it runs in his. We've both lost more than a couple relatives to it. We made the choice to go ahead anyhow though, because anyone in our families who had cancer developed it after the age of 50. No childhood diseases, nothing that would claim a young person's life in their mid 20s or 30s. When it came right down to it, we both agreed that we would NOT go ahead with a pregnancy if something excruciatingly painful or delibitating were discovered -- it wouldn't be fair to our child. We didn't think it right to go ahead and have a child if her childhood would likely be stolen from her, if she'd have a life of pain and agony. Thankfully, nothing at all was discovered that would be problematic... so we went ahead, and we celebrated when she was born.

Looking back on it all, now, I wonder about the depression risk. I wonder about the cancer risk. I wonder if we were selfish, to want a child who might have an ordinary life for the most part but might still struggle with these issues later on. Maybe we were selfish, but we wanted to share our love of kids and life with a child, so... I think our hearts were in the right place. When it comes down to it, a lot of families are affected by these common issues, anyhow, and most families go ahead and have kids anyway. I don't know. All I know is that I don't regret my choice. If there is such a thing as having a 'calling' in life... being her mommy's it for me, until the day I die.

Love this post. :)